The SSL 4000 is famous for being the console employed on more Platinum-selling records than any other. Its expansive, punchy, deep and assertive character have made it an industry standard of modern recording.
The preamp module offers a true reproduction of the famed SSL 001 preamp circuit and its full-of-character Jensen input transformer
Accurate emulation of the dbx output VCA circuit, including clipping.
There are two distinct EQ circuit topologies available in the SSL E Channel Strip. The classic Bbrown EQ is less exacting and musical, while the more modern Black circuit is more surgical and clean.
The Brown EQ bands can be boosted/attenuated by ±15 dB whereas the Black has a range of ±18 dB.
In Brown mode, the slope of the high pass filter is 6 dB per octave. In Black mode, the slope of the high pass filter is 18 dB per octave.
The slope of the low pass filter is 12 dB per octave in both Brown and Black modes.
A neat trick for toggling your filter settings in/out is to click the ‘Out’ text.
The compressor allows for a wide variety of dynamics response, from transparent to aggressive.
At heavy compression settings with quick release times, the SSL design has a similar room-expanding quality as the UREI 1176 on signals such as drum overheads and room mics.
Release time is continuously variable between 0.1 seconds and 4 seconds.
Compression attack time is program dependent and automatically varies between 3 ms – 30 ms. When Fast is engaged, the attack time is fixed at 3 milliseconds for 20 dB of gain reduction.
Exp/gate attack time is fixed at 1.5 milliseconds per 40 dB. When Fast is engaged, the attack time is fixed at 100 microseconds per 40 dB of gain reduction.
To analyse the non-linear behaviours of the SSL 4000 E Channel Strip, I ran a 100 Hz sine wave through the plug-in at various settings.
100 Hz sine wave at 0 dB through Line input at Unity
100 Hz sine wave at - 12 dB through Line input at +12 dB
100 Hz sine wave at -12 dB through Mic input no transformer (XFMR) at +2.4 dB
100 Hz sine wave at -12 dB through Mic input XFMR engaged at 3.3 dB
As you can see, the SSL I/O generates both even and odd lower order harmonics, with a prominent second at -60 dB. Hence the smooth and musically sympathetic sound of this channel strip. What I did find very interesting is that the harmonic generation is almost identical for all of the above setting.
Lets see how the dbx output VCA circuit modifies the sound…
100 Hz sine wave at -12 dB through Line input at +2 dB and VCA output at +10 dB
The second harmonic is approximately 10 dB lower than previous settings, with the subsequent odd ordered harmonics increasing by approximately the same. Odd ordered harmonics are often associated with ‘richness’ and ‘depth’, so if you want a smooth, constant sound drive input for a harder, richer sound drive the output VCA.
For this test I ran a drum loop through the SSL at various settings. I have compensated for level so that the drum loop peaks at -1 dBFS for maximum resolution of the waveform in Pro-L.
Dry Drum Loop -12 dB
Drum loop at -2.2 dB ran through SSL Line input at Unity
Drum loop at -12 dB ran through SSL Line input at +9.8 dB
Drum loop at -12 dB ran through Line input at Unity and boosted 9.7 dB post SSL
Surprisingly they all look the same, but they don’t sound the same! More of that to come later. The SSL subtly softens transients with some high frequency saturation, just look at how the hats have been attenuated. There is also an overshoot of about a dB during a small drum fill.
Lets overload the preamp section and attenuate VCA output fader.
Certainly different saturation characteristics, there is more transient rounding and less saturation/attenuation of high frequencies.
Drum loop at -12 dB ran through Mic input no XFMR
Drum loop at -12 dB ran through Mic input XFMR engaged
Very subtle differences in waveform, the most noticeable difference was the 1 dB attenuation when the XFMR was engaged.
I bet you are thinking shut up Paul and let me have a listen for myself…
Dry Drums (RMS matched)
SSL Drums Dry (RMS match).aif (678.3 KB)
SSL Drums Line.aif (678.3 KB)
Mic Input (no XFMX)
SSL Drums Mic No XFMR.aif (678.3 KB)
Mic Input with XFMX
SSL Drums Mic XFMR.aif (678.3 KB)
FREQUENCY AND PHASE RESPONSE
So if the harmonic generation and saturation characteristics are very similar, you may be asking why the unit sounds different at different settings. Well…
What I am looking for is the frequency and phase response of the plug-in at unity and how particular settings change this relationship.
Yellow - noise generated by the plug-in analysis software to analyse the plug-in
White - frequency response of the plug-in at that particular setting
Red - phase shift of the plug-in at that particular setting
Line input at Unity
Line input at Maximum
Mic Input at Unity (no XFMR)
Mic input at Unity (with XFMR)
Mic input at the midway point (with XFMR)
Mic input at maximum (with XFMR)
Wow! Just look at the difference in frequency and phase responses. These properties were continuously variable when adjusting I/O parameters.
It is worth noting that Dyn In and EQ In (at unity) had no effect on frequency or phase response.
I hope you enjoyed this article, I certainly enjoyed creating it and will do many more when time allows. If you have any suggestions for what plug-in to analyse next, please let me know.